top of page

Councils Should Prioritise The People, Not Net Zero

It's a choice between freedom and enslavement - the Earth will be fine


THAMES Valley Police estimated two thousand, but anyone attending the rally in Oxford on February 18 against the Low Traffic Neighbourhood (LTN) scheme knows that the true number was many times larger.


They came from across the country; I know of nearly a hundred fellow travellers from Sussex alone. Oxford is not the only city to announce prohibition of travel under the banner of Net Zero, but it became a focal point for resistance.


Many protestors were carrying on from marching against the covid-19 regime, having joined the dots on a broader plan to control the global population. This is not wild conspiracy theory; Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum wrote a book early on in the purported pandemic, titled Covid-19: the Great Reset, enthusing on the opportunities of lockdown and other coercive 'public health' interventions to radically change society.


It should now be clear that a cabal of corporations, bankers and nongovernmental organisations, aided by progressive political leaders (the Davos set) is really running the world. They care not for the ordinary people, but for their own elevation to an elite-run technocracy.


The contrived climate crisis is the means by which citizens are held in a tightening ratchet of supposedly ecological policies.

The Oxford LTN will charge residents for entering other areas of the city, and scores of streets have been blocked from main roads. Similar plans were declared by Bath, Canterbury and Edinburgh, and suddenly every local authority is getting in on the act.


Mayor of London Sadiq Khan is a seasoned eco-zealot, and in August, the Ultra Low Emissions Zone (ULEZ) will expand to the whole of Greater London. Hard-working families who need a car for the school run, and cannot afford a newer compliant model, will be charged £62.50 per week.


A petition against ULEZ on the government website, with almost 50,000 signatures at the time of writing, shows that London is a doughnut; the map clearly shows that outer boroughs have had enough of being used as a cash cow for Khan's ideological largesse.


Motoring is in a transitional phase, but the majority of the public seem unaware of the destination, naively believing that petrol and diesel cars are simply being replaced by electric vehicles, through a hybrid interim.


It would be practically impossible to charge the batteries of millions of electric cars, which are not ecologically clean, but are produced through intensive mining of rare minerals. Owners of electric cars will be fooled in the same way that Gordon Brown's diesel policy two decades ago led to higher costs for converts.


Tax incentives for electric cars will eventually be removed, and charging will be ruinously expensive as energy bills continue to rise. The truth is that the authorities do not want people to own cars; they do not want freedom of movement.


People need to understand the motives of their masters. The goal of technocracy is full control over population and resources, using the tremendous advances in surveillance technology to develop digital totalitarianism.


One of the first meetings taken by Grant Shapps, the government's new Minister for Climate Change and Net Zero, was with Bill Gates, who has shifted from master vaccinator to climate change expert.


The computer salesman was always destined for a world role. His father, head of the abortion industry in the USA Planned Parenthood), was a keen eugenicist. When the Club of Rome was founded in 1968, beginning the concerted 'Earth above people' climate crisis campaign in 1972, the depopulation agenda was afoot.


Schoolchildren are indoctrinated into believing that mankind is a stain on the Earth. The real reason for climate scaremongering is not to make the world greener and more sustainable, but to facilitate the New World Order, as described in Schwab's Great Reset.


Think about it: if our leaders were genuinely concerned about plastic pollution, they would have been more concerned at the billions of facemasks, testing kits and syringes produced for covid-19. And there would not be paper straws in a plastic sheath.


Net Zero, like Zero Covid, is a con. Let's do whatever we can to awaken friends and family to the dystopian designs of the technocrats. Putting it simply, it's a choice between freedom and enslavement; the Earth will be fine.



bottom of page