top of page

Two Wings On The Same Bird

Writer's picture: J RJ R

What if I told you, the right wing and the left wing belong to the same bird? Vote all you want, the flight plan doesn't change.


The accepted historical polarity between the left and the right has always been a far more complex relationship than most are prepared to understand.


The role of party politics - and ideological distinctions between left and right - has become problematic across the world.


There has been a clear sense for many that the Great Reset - and the rhetoric accompanying it - originates, not from Westminster but from a technocratic / billionaire elite class.


It is a class that operates through remote, democratically unaccountable institutions like the World Economic Forum, the World Health Organisation, the Center for Disease Control and the United Nations.


Those who have long been aware of this historical influence i.e., Jim Marrs, Patrick

M. Wood, and Anthony C. Sutton, have been warning for decades that party politics is a distraction, democracy an illusion, and that real political power resides in a far more covert and nefarious location.


Whilst the influence, organisation, and principal players behind the so-called ‘deep state' remain shrouded in mystery to a certain extent, an identifiable agenda has emerged since March 2020 which is clearly distinct from conventional left/right debates.


It has been argued that this is an agenda that has been orchestrated and coordinated by a small, unelected group of people who have anything but our best interests at heart.


Historians argue that the ideological evolution of the left and right political dichotomy evidences both democracy and the principles on which modern governance is based.


In the UK, the Labour Party established its early credentials through the representation of class-based interests, collective solidarity, and a push for more even distribution of income and wealth.


Traditionally, the Labour left has viewed politics and the political realm in a progressive way, in the sense that its primary modus operandi should be to act as a vehicle through which to ensure social mobility, greater economic equality, free healthcare and education, and state support for the unemployed and long-term sick.


Up until the 1980s, and particularly within the political nexus of the 'command-and-control' economies of the West, the Labour Party symbolised grassroots activism and civil society involvement in formal politics via trade unions and working class collectives.


The identity of the Labour left was also forged out of the interplay and tension with its mirror opposite, where political right (embodied particularly in the Conservative Party) has generally favoured minimal state regulation and the free play of market forces, preferring to let the invisible hand of economic innovation and entrepreneurship facilitate the trickle down of wealth through the class structure.


In the 1970s, the political scientist Anthony C. Sutton wrote a trilogy of books questioning the divide between left and right that the majority of historians and political commentators have assumed.


As Sutton argues, ultimately both the extreme right and the extreme left favour collectivism, big government, and a high level of state control.


Documenting the secret Wall Street bankrolling of leftist movements in a series of key historical events was, according to Sutton, the long-term cultivation and planning of what he termed ‘corporate socialism'.


In Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, Wall Street and the FDR, and Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler, Sutton outlines in detail an 'alternative view of history', which suggests that the accepted historical polarity between the left and the right has alwavs been a far more complex relationship than most are prepared to understand.


Significantly, he argues that not only is there a ruling elite that operates outside of formal politics, but that this group has always had a foot (and ready funding) in both camps.


He proposes that this convergence between left and right parties has been used by this elite class to strategically steer societies in ways that they are able to control from afar.


Sutton's arguments around this use of 'controlled opposition', have been corroborated by others such as Jim Marrs and Patrick M. Wood.


Interestingly, co-founder of the Trilateral Commission, Zbigniew Brezinski, gave an indication of this in his 1970 book Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technotronic Era, where he argued that Marxism, communism and socialism were never historical end points, but necessary stepping-stones to the New World Order that was, even then, being planned and put into motion.


So how do these insights relate to what is happening now?


There is certainly an argument to suggest that the social-justice agenda of the left has been promoted and deployed by the same group of people involved with overseeing the Great Reset agenda.


It is inarguable, in fact, that left-wing politics has been an enormous presence over the last three years of government policy throughout the world.


Much of the rhetoric and language Klaus Schwab and his colleagues have been using is clearly grounded in the promise of social justice, along a range of different issues.


For example, supporters of the Great Reset argue that their vision of the future will solve the environmental crisis by 'decoupling' the economy from natural fuel-based growth.


They also promise technocratic governance led by the WHO, which will ensure the containment of current and future health issues in a way that national governments have proven themselves to be incapable of.


Race, gender and self-identity will also be

'democratised', and freed from modernist limitations, categorisations, and injustices.


As the looming prospect of a one-state party draws ever nearer, the societal transformations that we have seen over the last few years suggest that the days of using controlled opposition may now be fast drawing to a close.


Rapid advances and mass rollout in Smart City technology, mass surveillance systems, join-up and activation of the Internet of Things, 5G rollout, the total tie-up of the media, and the massive censorship of all opposing groups, viewpoints, and positions means that the possibilities for political, economic and social control are now well beyond anything we have seen in history.


Political manipulation, and control of opposition parties and ideologies, may no longer be necessary in a world where technology is now mature enough to take the hard yards away from the authoritarian dream, to a place where there is no longer the need for any form of delegation beyond the realms of Big Tech and its overlords.



bottom of page